Heterogeneous Beliefs and the Choice Between Private Restructuring and Formal Bankruptcy

Pascal François and Alon Raviv

Cahiers de recherche from CIRPEE

Abstract: We present a novel theory to explain the puzzling issue regarding why certain firms in financial distress, that must renegotiate their debt prefer a formal bankruptcy procedure, which is more costly, over direct negotiations with their debtholders. Specifically, we show that claimholders’ heterogeneous beliefs about the possible results of a formal plan – and about judicial discretion in particular – may lead to such a preference. In our model, informal processes are preferred when the total value of all corporate claims in a formal procedure, according to each claimholder’s beliefs, is less than the total value of the firm’s assets in an informal process. In such a case, all claimholders believe that they will be better off under an informal process because there is a positive surplus that can be divided among the parties (Pareto Improving). The proposed model can predict which resolution would be chosen under any set of claimholders’ beliefs about the different determinants driving the outcome of a formal procedure, such as the cost of bankruptcy, the likelihood of deviation from the absolute priority rule in a reorganization plan, and the probability of the court adopting a reorganization plan. An empirical analysis of 252 defaults in Moody’s annual reports during the 1996-2011 period supports the argument that heterogeneous beliefs ad creditor coordination problems are important drivers of the decision to restructure under formal bankruptcy procedures rather than through private workouts.

Keywords: Formal procedure; informal process; heterogeneous beliefs; judicial discretion; bankruptcy; liquidation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: G12 G32 G33 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.cirpee.org/fileadmin/documents/Cahiers_2014/CIRPEE14-01.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:lvl:lacicr:1401

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Cahiers de recherche from CIRPEE Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Manuel Paradis ().