The expressive function of legal norms: Experimental evidence from the Supply Chain Act in Germany

Daniel Engler (), Marvin Gleue (), Gunnar Gutsche (), Sophia Möller () and Andreas Ziegler ()
Additional contact information
Daniel Engler: University of Kassel, Institute of Economics
Marvin Gleue: University of Kassel, Institute of Economics
Gunnar Gutsche: University of Kassel, Institute of Economics
Sophia Möller: University of Kassel, Institute of Economics
Andreas Ziegler: University of Kassel, Institute of Economics

MAGKS Papers on Economics from Philipps-Universität Marburg, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics, Department of Economics (Volkswirtschaftliche Abteilung)

Abstract: Legal norms can have a direct effect on individual behavior through their legal enforcement. However, according to the ‘expressive function of law,’ they can also have indirect effects on individual behavior by shaping related social norms. Since evidence for this expressive function is scarce, we consider a new law on corporate due diligence for the protection of human rights and the environment (i.e. the German Supply Chain Act) and empirically examine its indirect effects on individual sustainable purchasing behavior, as indicated by the willingness to pay (WTP) for sustainable socks, where sustainability is ensured by the certification with a label of the Fair Wear Foundation. The empirical analysis is based on data from a pre-registered and incentivized experiment implemented in a representative survey of 1,017 citizens in Germany. Before making socks purchasing decisions and the elicitation of related personal injunctive and perceived social norms, the respondents were randomly assigned to either a control group or a treatment group that received information about the German Supply Chain Act. We examine average treatment effects and, based on a causal mediation analysis, the mediating role of related personal injunctive and perceived social norms on individual sustainable purchasing behavior. A manipulation check shows that the treatment information has a significantly positive effect on individual knowledge about the objectives of the German Supply Chain Act. However, the treatment information has no significant effect on the WTP for sustainable socks with the Fair Wear Foundation label or on related norms. Although our mediation analysis reveals that personal injunctive and perceived social norms are significantly positively correlated with this WTP, our experimental analysis does not provide any evidence for the expressive function of law in the case of the German Supply Chain Act and individual sustainable purchasing behavior.

Keywords: Legal norms; personal injunctive norm; perceived social norms; German Supply Chain Act; individual sustainable purchasing behavior (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D91 K38 Q58 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 55 pages
Date: 2025
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-exp, nep-law and nep-soc
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.uni-marburg.de/en/fb02/research-groups ... 5-papers/10-2025.pdf First version (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:mar:magkse:202510

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in MAGKS Papers on Economics from Philipps-Universität Marburg, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics, Department of Economics (Volkswirtschaftliche Abteilung) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Bernd Hayo ().