 Merging Municipalities: Is Bigger Better?Enid Slack and Richard Bird No 14, IMFG Papers from University of Toronto, Institute on Municipal Finance and Governance Abstract: This paper describes the challenges of governing metropolitan regions in different parts of the world and the range of restructuring options that are considered to address them, including two-tier models, voluntary cooperation, special purpose districts and amalgamations. The authors conclude that, based on the international evidence, two-tier structures may be more effective in allowing metropolitan regions to reap the benefits that come with large size, while retaining the responsiveness typical of smaller municipalities. It also includes a case study of the amalgamation in Toronto that provides new empirical research about its effects on expenditures on municipal services and tax revenues, and the implications for governance and citizen participation. While Toronto’s amalgamation has resulted in higher expenditures and has not solved any of the regional issues, it may have had some benefits: a fairer sharing of the tax base among rich and poor municipalities and the ability to equalize local service levels across the larger city. Keywords: municipalities; amalgamation; infrastructure; large cities (search for similar items in EconPapers) Published in hard copy and online Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:mfg:wpaper:14 Access Statistics for this paper More papers in IMFG Papers from University of Toronto, Institute on Municipal Finance and Governance Contact information at EDIRC. |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.