Classification problems and the dividing line between government and the market: an examination of NHS foundation trust classification in the UK

David Price () and Allyson Pollock ()

Departmental Working Papers from Department of Economics, Management and Quantitative Methods at Università degli Studi di Milano

Abstract: Scientific evaluation of the impact of privatization on solidaristic health care goals is virtually non-existent. In this paper it is argued that an important cause of the poverty of evidence is researchers’ reliance on national accounting categories in comparisons of public and private sector performance. These categories are based on perfect market assumptions derived from microeconomics and provide highly restricted grounds for distinguishing between government and market sectors. In practice, definition of the public sector is made without reference to the attainment of substantive public policy goals such as universality. Therefore governments’ loss of ability to pursue solidaristic goals is not treated as a defining characteristic of privatization. The argument has important consequences for nonprofit providers. Whilst nonprofits are often classed as public sector their introduction can nonetheless reduce equity in health systems by eroding government control over resource allocation. National accounts sectoral classification cannot address this consequence of public sector reform and therefore it is often overlooked. The argument is illustrated with an example taken from the UK’s National Health Service.

Keywords: Public economics; Public administration; National accounts; Non profit organizations (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: H41 H42 H44 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010-09-29
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://wp.demm.unimi.it/files/wp/2010/DEMM-2010_032wp.pdf (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 500 Can't connect to aaa.unimi.it:80 (nodename nor servname provided, or not known) (http://wp.demm.unimi.it/files/wp/2010/DEMM-2010_032wp.pdf [302 Found]--> http://aaa.unimi.it)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:mil:wpdepa:2010-32

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Departmental Working Papers from Department of Economics, Management and Quantitative Methods at Università degli Studi di Milano Via Conservatorio 7, I-20122 Milan - Italy. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by DEMM Working Papers ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).