A Simulation Study to Compare Weighting Methods for Survey Nonresponses in the National Survey of Recent College Graduates

Amang Sukasih, Donsig Jang, Sonya Vartivarian, Stephen Cohen and Fan Zhang

Mathematica Policy Research Reports from Mathematica Policy Research

Abstract: Common methods to adjust sampling weights to account for survey nonresponse are the weighting cell technique, response propensity modeling, or a combination of both.

Keywords: Weighting; Methods; Survey Nonresponses (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 15
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mathematica.org/-/media/publications/pdfs/simulationstudy.pdf (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 404 Not Found (https://www.mathematica.org/-/media/publications/pdfs/simulationstudy.pdf [302 Found]--> https://www.mathematica.org/System/404-page-not-found?ItemNotFound=true)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:mpr:mprres:613f000cac94492f91b53813f1146dd7

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Mathematica Policy Research Reports from Mathematica Policy Research Mathematica Policy Research P.O. Box 2393 Princeton, NJ 08543-2393 Attn: Communications. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Joanne Pfleiderer () and Cindy George ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).