Comparative Effectiveness Research and Innovations: Policy Options to Foster Medical Advances

Emily Carrier, Hoangmai H. Pham and Eugene Rich

Mathematica Policy Research Reports from Mathematica Policy Research

Abstract: This policy analysis examines how determining what treatments work best for which patients in real-world settings—known as comparative effectiveness research—can help foster beneficial medical innovation.

Keywords: Comparative Effectiveness Research; CER; Health (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 10
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://nihcr.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Policy_Analysis_No._3.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:mpr:mprres:771c5f1f929f48d99bf15d750530fbca

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Mathematica Policy Research Reports from Mathematica Policy Research Mathematica Policy Research P.O. Box 2393 Princeton, NJ 08543-2393 Attn: Communications. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Joanne Pfleiderer () and Cindy George ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).