Mixed-methods Study on Work-disabled Adults Who Do Not Apply for Social Security Disability Benefits

Lila Rabinovich, Doerte U. Junghaenel and Tabasa Ozawa
Additional contact information
Lila Rabinovich: University of Southern California Center for Economic and Social Research
Doerte U. Junghaenel: University of Southern California Center for Economic and Social Research
Tabasa Ozawa: University of Southern California Center for Economic and Social Research

Working Papers from University of Michigan, Michigan Retirement Research Center

Abstract: Take-up gaps in safety net programs, which have been long documented in the United States and elsewhere, are an important policy question as nontake-up compromises the equity objectives and efficacy of programs. The Social Security Disability program is an example of this: More than 20 million adults report a work disability, but only around 11 million currently receive disability benefits through the Social Security Disability Insurance or Supplemental Security Income programs. This comprehensive mixed-methods study examines the characteristics and decision-making around benefits applications among adults with self-reported work disability who have never applied for disability benefits. Analysis of survey data suggests that the availability of personal and socioeconomic resources, including younger age, educational attainment, spousal support, and income may act as buffers to feeling the need to apply for disability benefits. Greater cognitive resources, in particular quantitative and verbal reasoning skills, were associated with a greater likelihood of not applying. Qualitatively, we find that high transaction costs involved in disability applications coupled with the widespread perception of low approval rates may be a critical deterrent for eligible individuals. Uncertain and lengthy medical processes after disability onset were also frequently reported as a central deterrent. Stigma about receiving disability benefits does not emerge as a factor in application behavior, although a change in self-concept involving an adjustment to benefit-receiving, work-disabled status was cited as a deterrent to claiming. These insights could inform targeted interventions to reduce barriers to take-up of benefits among potentially eligible adults.

Pages: 38 pages
Date: 2023-10
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://mrdrc.isr.umich.edu/publications/papers/pdf/wp477.pdf (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 403 Forbidden

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:mrr:papers:wp477

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from University of Michigan, Michigan Retirement Research Center P.O. Box 1248, Ann Arbor, MI 48104. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by MRRC Administrator (mrrcumich@umich.edu).