EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Comparison of take-it-or-leave-it and take-it-or-leave-it with follow-up elicitation formats - case study of Czech national parks

Michaela Antoušková
Additional contact information
Michaela Antoušková: Katedra ekonomiky, Provozně ekonomická fakulta, Česká zemědělská univerzita v Praze, Kamýcká 129, 165 21 Praha 6-Suchdol, Česká republika

Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 2012, vol. 60, issue 7, 19-26

Abstract: This paper focuses on comparison of two different elicitation formats commonly used in the Willingness-to-pay method. It compares the difference in influence of chosen respondents' characteristics on their willingness to pay for evaluated non-market good applying the take-it-or-leave-it (single-bounded choice) and take-it-it-or-leave-it with follow-up (double-bounded choice) elicitation formats. The good evaluated in the presented article is recreation in nature-based areas. The research is conducted in two primer nature-based recreational areas in the Czech Republic (National Park Sumava, National Park Podyji). The data sources are gathered from a tourist survey carried out in both the studied areas. A logistic regression is used for evaluation of the results. Based on the analysed method, two models are developed. The binary model elaborates the take-it-or-leave-it approach and the ordinal model elaborates the extended approach - take-it-it-or-leave-it with follow-up. The influence of personal and socioeconomic tourists' characteristics on their willingness to pay is predicted in both models and consequently compared. The predictors analysed include sex, age, education, frequency of visitation of studied areas, and total costs spent during the actual visit.

Keywords: nature-based tourism; willingness-to-pay method; binary model; ordinal model; take-it-or-leave-it question; take-it-or-leave-it with follow-up question (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2012
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://acta.mendelu.cz/doi/10.11118/actaun201260070019.html (text/html)
http://acta.mendelu.cz/doi/10.11118/actaun201260070019.pdf (application/pdf)
free of charge

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:mup:actaun:actaun_2012060070019

DOI: 10.11118/actaun201260070019

Access Statistics for this article

Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis is currently edited by Markéta Havlásková

More articles in Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis from Mendel University Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Ivo Andrle ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:mup:actaun:actaun_2012060070019