Research and Development Indicators of EU28 Countries from Viewpoint of Super-efficiency DEA Analysis
Beáta Gavurová,
Martina Halásková and
Samuel Koróny
Additional contact information
Beáta Gavurová: Department of Banking and Investment, Faculty of Economics Technical University of Košice, Němcovej 32, 040 01 Košice, Slovakia
Martina Halásková: Department of Public Economics, Faculty of Economics, VŠB - Technical University of Ostrava, Sokolská třída 33, 702 00 Ostrava, Czech Republic
Samuel Koróny: Research and Innovation Centre, Faculty of Economics, Matej Bel University, Cesta na amfiteáter 1, 974 01 Banská Bystrica, Slovakia
Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 2019, vol. 67, issue 1, 225-242
Abstract:
Research and development are important sources of economic growth and social welfare and play a key role in creating new knowledge, products and technological processes. In our paper we focused on the analysis and evaluation of research and innovation potential in the European Union countries in 2010 and 2015 using Data Envelopment Analysis. For the evaluation, seven indicators were selected, as starting point for the evaluation of research activities and the measurement of the innovation performance and of competitiveness of the individual countries. Input capital indicators were - R&D expenditure in the higher education sector and in the business enterprise sector as % of GDP. Input human labour indicators were total researchers (FTE), human resources in science and technology (HRST) as % of active population and employment in total service intensive sectors as % of total employment. Output indicators were the number of scientific publications and high-tech export as % of total export. On basis of DEA super-efficiency analyses results we can make following conclusions. The best group of five countries is characterized by efficient status in both analysed periods 2010 and 2015 (Bulgaria, Romania, Cyprus, Croatia and United Kingdom). The second group contains two countries Germany and Italy. This countries improved status from inefficient in 2010 to efficient in 2015. In the third group are five countries that worsened their status from efficient in 2010 to inefficient one in 2015: Portugal, Malta, Poland, Luxembourg and Netherlands. In last fourth group are all other EU28 countries that were inefficient in both analysed periods 2010 and 2015. In group of V4 countries situation is not optimistic. Poland worsened its status from efficient in 2010 to inefficient one in 2015 and three remaining countries - Hungary, Czech Republic and Slovakia stagnated in inefficient status in both periods. On the opposite there was not significant difference in super-efficiencies in 2010 and in 2015 and in their differences between capitalist and post-socialist EU28 countries.
Keywords: Data Envelopment Analysis; EU countries; indicators; research & development; slack based model; super-efficiency analysis (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://acta.mendelu.cz/doi/10.11118/actaun201967010225.html (text/html)
http://acta.mendelu.cz/doi/10.11118/actaun201967010225.pdf (application/pdf)
free of charge
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:mup:actaun:actaun_2019067010225
DOI: 10.11118/actaun201967010225
Access Statistics for this article
Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis is currently edited by Markéta Havlásková
More articles in Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis from Mendel University Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Ivo Andrle ().