A spatial emergent constraint on the sensitivity of soil carbon turnover to global warming
Rebecca M. Varney (),
Sarah E. Chadburn,
Pierre Friedlingstein,
Eleanor J. Burke,
Charles D. Koven,
Gustaf Hugelius and
Peter M. Cox
Additional contact information
Rebecca M. Varney: University of Exeter
Sarah E. Chadburn: University of Exeter
Pierre Friedlingstein: University of Exeter
Eleanor J. Burke: Met Office Hadley Centre
Charles D. Koven: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Gustaf Hugelius: Stockholm University
Peter M. Cox: University of Exeter
Nature Communications, 2020, vol. 11, issue 1, 1-8
Abstract:
Abstract Carbon cycle feedbacks represent large uncertainties in climate change projections, and the response of soil carbon to climate change contributes the greatest uncertainty to this. Future changes in soil carbon depend on changes in litter and root inputs from plants and especially on reductions in the turnover time of soil carbon (τs) with warming. An approximation to the latter term for the top one metre of soil (ΔCs,τ) can be diagnosed from projections made with the CMIP6 and CMIP5 Earth System Models (ESMs), and is found to span a large range even at 2 °C of global warming (−196 ± 117 PgC). Here, we present a constraint on ΔCs,τ, which makes use of current heterotrophic respiration and the spatial variability of τs inferred from observations. This spatial emergent constraint allows us to halve the uncertainty in ΔCs,τ at 2 °C to −232 ± 52 PgC.
Date: 2020
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-19208-8 Abstract (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nat:natcom:v:11:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-020-19208-8
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.nature.com/ncomms/
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-19208-8
Access Statistics for this article
Nature Communications is currently edited by Nathalie Le Bot, Enda Bergin and Fiona Gillespie
More articles in Nature Communications from Nature
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().