EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Causal inference on human behaviour

Drew H. Bailey (), Alexander J. Jung, Adriene M. Beltz, Markus I. Eronen, Christian Gische, Ellen L. Hamaker, Konrad P. Kording, Catherine Lebel, Martin A. Lindquist, Julia Moeller, Adeel Razi, Julia M. Rohrer, Baobao Zhang and Kou Murayama
Additional contact information
Drew H. Bailey: University of California, Irvine
Alexander J. Jung: University of Tübingen
Adriene M. Beltz: University of Michigan
Markus I. Eronen: University of Groningen
Christian Gische: Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Ellen L. Hamaker: Utrecht University
Konrad P. Kording: University of Pennsylvania
Catherine Lebel: Alberta Children’s Hospital Research Institute
Martin A. Lindquist: Johns Hopkins University
Julia Moeller: Leipzig University
Adeel Razi: Monash University
Julia M. Rohrer: Leipzig University
Baobao Zhang: Syracuse University
Kou Murayama: University of Tübingen

Nature Human Behaviour, 2024, vol. 8, issue 8, 1448-1459

Abstract: Abstract Making causal inferences regarding human behaviour is difficult given the complex interplay between countless contributors to behaviour, including factors in the external world and our internal states. We provide a non-technical conceptual overview of challenges and opportunities for causal inference on human behaviour. The challenges include our ambiguous causal language and thinking, statistical under- or over-control, effect heterogeneity, interference, timescales of effects and complex treatments. We explain how methods optimized for addressing one of these challenges frequently exacerbate other problems. We thus argue that clearly specified research questions are key to improving causal inference from data. We suggest a triangulation approach that compares causal estimates from (quasi-)experimental research with causal estimates generated from observational data and theoretical assumptions. This approach allows a systematic investigation of theoretical and methodological factors that might lead estimates to converge or diverge across studies.

Date: 2024
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-024-01939-z Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nat:nathum:v:8:y:2024:i:8:d:10.1038_s41562-024-01939-z

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.nature.com/nathumbehav/

DOI: 10.1038/s41562-024-01939-z

Access Statistics for this article

Nature Human Behaviour is currently edited by Stavroula Kousta

More articles in Nature Human Behaviour from Nature
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:nat:nathum:v:8:y:2024:i:8:d:10.1038_s41562-024-01939-z