Spatially differentiated nitrogen supply is key in a global food–fertilizer price crisis
Sieglinde Snapp (),
Tek Bahadur Sapkota,
Jordan Chamberlin,
Cindy Marie Cox,
Samuel Gameda,
Mangi Lal Jat,
Paswel Marenya,
Khondoker Abdul Mottaleb,
Christine Negra,
Kalimuthu Senthilkumar,
Tesfaye Shiferaw Sida,
Upendra Singh,
Zachary P. Stewart,
Kindie Tesfaye and
Bram Govaerts
Additional contact information
Sieglinde Snapp: International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), El Batán
Tek Bahadur Sapkota: International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), El Batán
Jordan Chamberlin: International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT)
Cindy Marie Cox: Private consultancy
Samuel Gameda: International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT)
Mangi Lal Jat: International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT)
Paswel Marenya: International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT)
Khondoker Abdul Mottaleb: University of Arkansas
Christine Negra: Versant Vision LLC
Kalimuthu Senthilkumar: Africa Rice Center (AfricaRice)
Tesfaye Shiferaw Sida: International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT)
Upendra Singh: International Fertilizer Development Center
Zachary P. Stewart: United States Agency for International Development
Kindie Tesfaye: International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT)
Bram Govaerts: International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), El Batán
Nature Sustainability, 2023, vol. 6, issue 10, 1268-1278
Abstract:
Abstract A regional geopolitical conflict and sudden massive supply disruptions have revealed vulnerabilities in our global fuel–fertilizer–food nexus. As nitrogen (N) fertilizer price spikes threaten food security, differentiated responses are required to maintain staple cereal yields across over- and underfertilized agricultural systems. Through integrated management of organic and inorganic N sources in high- to low-input cereal production systems, we estimate potential total N-fertilizer savings of 11% in India, 49% in Ethiopia and 44% in Malawi. Shifting to more cost-effective, high-N fertilizer (such as urea), combined with compost and integration of legumes, can optimize N in N-deficient systems. Better targeted and more efficient N-fertilizer use will benefit systems with surplus N. Geospatially differentiated fertilization strategies should prioritize high-N fertilizer supply to low-yield, N-deficient locations and balanced fertilization of N, P, K and micronutrients in high-yield systems. Nationally, governments can invest in extension and realign subsidies to enable and incentivize improved N management at the farm level.
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41893-023-01166-w Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nat:natsus:v:6:y:2023:i:10:d:10.1038_s41893-023-01166-w
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.nature.com/natsustain/
DOI: 10.1038/s41893-023-01166-w
Access Statistics for this article
Nature Sustainability is currently edited by Monica Contestabile
More articles in Nature Sustainability from Nature
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().