Computational Economics and Economic Theory: Substitutes or Complements
Kenneth Judd
No 208, NBER Technical Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc
Abstract:
This essay examines the idea and potential of a computational approach to theory,' discusses methodological issues raised by such computational methods, and outlines the problems associated with the dissemination of computational methods and the exposition of computational results. We argue that the study of a theory need not be confined to proving theorems, that current and future computer technologies create new possibilities for theoretical analysis, and that by resolving these issues we can create an intellectual atmosphere in which computational methods will make substantial contributions to economic analysis.
JEL-codes: C63 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1997-02
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-evo and nep-tid
Note: PE
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (47)
Published as Judd, Kenneth L. "Computational Economics And Economic Theory Substitutes Or Complements?," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 1997, v21(6,Jun), 907-942.
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.nber.org/papers/t0208.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
Journal Article: Computational economics and economic theory: Substitutes or complements? (1997) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nbr:nberte:0208
Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
http://www.nber.org/papers/t0208
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in NBER Technical Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138, U.S.A.. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().