No-Risk Mobility: Through College to University

Daniil Alexandrov, Ksenia Tenisheva and Svetlana Savelyeva
Additional contact information
Daniil Alexandrov: http://www.hse.ru/en/org/persons/4132356
Ksenia Tenisheva: http://www.hse.ru/en/org/persons/8995252
Svetlana Savelyeva: http://www.hse.ru/en/org/persons/4405712

Voprosy obrazovaniya / Educational Studies Moscow, 2015, issue 3, 66-91

Abstract: Daniil Alexandrov - Candidate of Sciences in Biology, Head, Sociology of Education and Science Laboratory, National Research University-Higher School of Economics (St. Petersburg). E-mail: dalexandrov@hse.ruKsenia Tenisheva - Research Assistant, Sociology of Education and Science Laboratory, National Research University-Higher School of Economics (St. Petersburg). E-mail: tenishewa.soc@gmail.comSvetlana Savelyeva - Deputy Head, Sociology of Education and Science Laboratory, National Research University-Higher School of Economics (St. Petersburg). E-mail: ssavelieva@hse.ruAddress: 55/2 Sedova str., 192174, Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation.The vocational college system is regarded as a social mobility channel providing the highest profit with minimal risk. We analyze the specific features and trends of the institutional context that has developed in Russia over the last 15 years, which promote development of such channel. We discriminate between three types of colleges that have emerged after reorganization of this education level in Russia. Colleges of the three types differ in their legal status and in the way they interact with universities. We describe a social group using the through college to university educational trajectory. Its members fall in between those reproducing the qualified worker status and those reproducing the highly qualified professional status. Such people usually perform averagely at school. Having surveyed nine-graders in Saint Petersburg and in one of the districts in Leningrad region, we analyze the motives for choosing the through college to university educational trajectory and the ideas students with their parents had about benefits, costs, and risks of this pathway. It appears that geographical location plays a key role in choosing this trajectory. Opting for an alternative educational pathway is less typical of rural students dealing with much more structural constrains than their urban counterparts. Unlike in large cities, only more informed and higher-status groups make this choice in the countryside. A comparison of college systems in several countries allows to conclude that colleges in Russia represent an upward social mobility channel, just like in USA and unlike in Germany, where colleges ensure social reproduction.DOI: 10.17323/1814-9545-2015-3-66-91

Keywords: persistent inequality; intermediate vocational education; higher education; “through college to university” educational trajectory; social mobility; relative risk aversion (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nos:voprob:2015:i:3:p:66-91

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Voprosy obrazovaniya / Educational Studies Moscow from National Research University Higher School of Economics
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Marta Morozova ().