Expected Stock Market Returns and Volatility: Three Decades Later
Haimanot Kassa,
Feifei Wang and
Yan Xuemin (Sterling)
Critical Finance Review, 2023, vol. 12, issue 1-4, 271-307
Abstract:
We replicate the findings of French, Schwert, and Stambaugh (FSS, 1987) almost exactly. Consistent with FSS, we find modest evidence of a positive relation between market risk premium and the expected market volatility and strong evidence of a negative relation between market excess returns and the unexpected change in market volatility during 1928 to 1984. These results persist during 1985 to 2018 and are robust to alternative data and model specifications. We extend the analysis to 23 developed countries and find qualitatively similar results. We show that the risk-return tradeoff is stronger during expansions than during recessions and does not vary significantly with investor sentiment.
Keywords: Expected market return; Volatility; Risk-return tradeoff; EGARCH (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: G11 G12 G14 G15 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/104.00000132 (application/xml)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:now:jnlcfr:104.00000132
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Critical Finance Review from now publishers
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Lucy Wiseman ().