Are Two-Way Fixed-Effect Difference-In-Differences Estimates Blowing Smoke? A Cautionary Tale from State-Level Bank Branching Deregulation

Anthony Zdrojewski and Alexander W. Butler

Critical Finance Review, 2024, vol. 13, issue 3-4, 501-529

Abstract: We illustrate the sensitivity of two-way fixed effects difference-in-differences estimates to innocuous changes in data structure. Using the staggered rollout of state-level bank branching deregulations, three outcome variables are brought to bear on the interventions: personal income growth (a replication), house prices (new to the literature), and per capita cigarette purchases (a falsification test). Estimates are sensitive to panel length, and the data structure creates the false impression of a causal effect of the interventions on all three outcome variables. We contend that any two-way fixed effects regression using this set of interventions is at risk of generating spurious results.

Date: 2024
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/104.00000147 (application/xml)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:now:jnlcfr:104.00000147

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Critical Finance Review from now publishers
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Lucy Wiseman ().