Tracking functional devolution by states to panchayats
Indira Rajaraman () and
Darshy Sinha ()
Additional contact information
Indira Rajaraman: National Institute of Public Finance and Policy
Darshy Sinha: National Institute of Public Finance and Policy
Working Papers from National Institute of Public Finance and Policy
Abstract:
The Eleventh Schedule added to the Constitution by the Seventy-third Amendment lists twenty-nine functions developable by States to Panchayati Raj Institutions (PRIs). States were free to set the speed and design of their approach to decentralization under the general framework of the Constitutional mandate. Fourteen years on, a quantitative measure is attempted in this paper of the extent to which functional transfers have been achieved through the budgetary transfer of funds, with respect to the fiscal year 2006-07, in four states: Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Rajasthan and Orissa. The approach taken here is thus radically different from that in official documents, where functional transfer to PRIs is dealt with in a purely qualitative manner, based on administrative notifications. Without an associated budgetary provision these do not carry any operational significance.
Keywords: Function devolution; Rural local bodies (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: H72 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 50
Date: 2007-05
Note: Working Paper 48, 2007
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.nipfp.org.in/newweb/sites/default/files/wp_2007_48.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:npf:wpaper:07/48
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from National Institute of Public Finance and Policy
Bibliographic data for series maintained by S.Siva Chidambaram ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).