Actors of Creativity and Entrepreneurship in Romania
Bogdan Hrib ()
Additional contact information
Bogdan Hrib: Tritonic Publishing Group
Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, 2018, vol. 6, issue 4, 655-672
Abstract:
The new trends in the cultural and creative industries (CCI) that were theorized in the second half of the 20th century, simultaneously with the rapid development of technology, have created in post-communist Romania the premises of developing a new model of creative entrepreneurship. Nevertheless, the digitization of society and general strategic projects are not enough to create a catalyst for the explosion of entrepreneurial creativity. The unstable political climate and the lack of predictability have prompted the insecurity of the new business of "anonymous" creators - those who are not seen, those who are at the heart of cultural and creative industries - small and medium enterprises (SME), licensing individuals (PFA), family associations (AF). The Western models long described in the motivational literature published in Romania, as well as some notorious Romanian examples intensely publicized as the Romanian counterpart of Western companies, do not help and do not solve the generation of daily solutions or, more than that, Strategic Creative Solutions for grassroots companies. The present paper tries to define the terms necessary for the creative area and to analyze the situation today in Romania, presenting shortly, for comparison, the Western models, the Romanian models of notoriety, but also four examples of “anonymous†actors in the creative industries area: a floral workshop paper, an IT service company, a graphic design agency and a printing house. The conclusions of this punctual analysis are of an empirical nature, but they provide a picture of the fragility of the business environment in the area of cultural and creative industries, amid a timid and fragile but steady market growth.
Keywords: creativity; entrepreneurship; entrepreneur; small and medium enterprises; (SMEs); licensing individuals (PFA); family associations (AF); Cultural and Creative Industries (CCI). (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.managementdynamics.ro/index.php/journal/article/download/288/240 (application/pdf)
http://www.managementdynamics.ro/index.php/journal/article/view/288/240 (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nup:jrmdke:v:6:y:2018:i:4:655-672
Access Statistics for this article
Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy is currently edited by Contantin BRATIANU, Florina PINZARU, Elena Madalina VATAMANESCU and Alexandra ZBUCHEA
More articles in Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy from College of Management, National University of Political Studies and Public Administration Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Cristian-Mihai VIDU ().