Weak Permission is not Well-Founded, Grounded and Stable

Guido Governatori

No dr5wb, OSF Preprints from Center for Open Science

Abstract: We consider the notion of weak permission as the failure to conclude that the opposite obligation. We investigate the issue from the point of non-monotonic reasoning, specifically logic programming and structured argumentation, and we show that it is not possible to capture weak permission in the presence of deontic conflicts under the well-founded, grounded and (sceptical) stable semantics.

Date: 2024-11-19
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://osf.io/download/6737cd9dc44afbb78ed4ded8/

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:osf:osfxxx:dr5wb

DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/dr5wb

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in OSF Preprints from Center for Open Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by OSF ().