 Why the statement “the digital humanities have no theory” is a liar’s paradoxDan Costa Baciu
No mg6kr, OSF Preprints from Center for Open Science Abstract: In philosophy, “liar’s paradoxes” are a category of self-denying statements that have been known and studied for more than two millennia. Figuratively, operating with a liar’s paradox is like pulling the rug under your own feet. The statement that the digital humanities have no theory (no-theory-statement) falls into this same category of paradoxes. The paradox is that this no-theory-statement is in itself a theoretical statement, a “no-theory-theoretical-statement,” or more simply a “no-theory-theory.” The theory denies its own existence and is therefore self-denying. The same conclusions can also be reached over another path of reasoning. The statement that the digital humanities have no theory logically means that the digital humanities cannot make any theoretical statement. This leaves us with a “no-theoretical-statement-statement,” or simply, a “no-statement-statement,” which is again self-denying. The consequence of self-denial is devastating for any scientific theory. As a consequence of self-denial, the no-theory-statement cannot make any predictions and must therefore remain untestable. This present article follows the no-theory-statement, as a liar’s paradox, from the end of the 19th century and from controversies around Vilfredo Pareto’s statistics to sociology with Pierre Bourdieu, and to present-day digital humanities. Date: 2018-03-09 Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:osf:osfxxx:mg6kr Access Statistics for this paper More papers in OSF Preprints from Center for Open Science |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.