Making interview transcripts open: Preliminary results from a scoping review

Evangeline Gowie, Anna Tsakalaki and Etienne Benoit Roesch
Additional contact information
Etienne Benoit Roesch: University of Reading

No pzyvt_v1, OSF Preprints from Center for Open Science

Abstract: Making research data open is recognised as improving both the quality of individual research outputs, and the effectiveness of the perpetuated ‘self-correcting’ goals of research overall. Many funders now mandate open data as a condition of their grants. This can be difficult for qualitative researchers, whose data poses different obstacles to the quantitative data that these policies seem to be aimed at. This pre-print represents the preliminary results of a scoping review into the practical steps that qualitative researchers can take towards opening their transcripts. From each included article, we extracted specific actions that a researcher could take to overcome an identified barrier. From these, we constructed eight themes: confidentiality, consent, misappropriation of data, context, copyright, IRB approval, researcher distress and time and money. We have presented the preliminary findings in the form of a table based ‘tool’, organised via these themes, which we used to develop our own data management plan.

Date: 2024-12-12
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-mac
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://osf.io/download/6759d18a7a16b286220bca21/

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:osf:osfxxx:pzyvt_v1

DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/pzyvt_v1

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in OSF Preprints from Center for Open Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by OSF ().