Are Women Better Politicians? Discrimination, Gender Quotas, and Electoral Accountability

Zuheir Desai, Varun Karekurve-Ramachandra and Sergio Montero
Additional contact information
Varun Karekurve-Ramachandra: Stanford University

No txzwg_v1, OSF Preprints from Center for Open Science

Abstract: Gender quotas have been instrumental in addressing the political underrepresentation of women, and there is growing evidence that politician gender may significantly affect public policy. Yet the sources of these gender differences have not been examined from an electoral accountability perspective, nor has the role of having a quota system in place. Using novel data on constituent evaluations of municipal councilors in Mumbai, India—where reserved-seat gender quotas are assigned by lottery—we develop and estimate an accountability model in which male incumbents face probabilistic term limits. We find that female councilors significantly outperform their male counterparts, but reserved-seat quotas have countervailing selection and discipline effects. Due to tastebased discrimination by voters, counterfactual experiments reveal that gender quotas are indispensable to ensure women are not politically underrepresented. However, the latter can be achieved while improving voter welfare by mitigating the perverse incentives of term limits.

Date: 2024-12-02
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://osf.io/download/6746a0ee7f5d2bf10596bea8/

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:osf:osfxxx:txzwg_v1

DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/txzwg_v1

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in OSF Preprints from Center for Open Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by OSF ().