Breakdowns in Scientific Practices: How and Why Practices Can Lead to Less than Rational Conclusions (and Proposed Solutions)

Mark White and Roar Bakken Stovner
Additional contact information
Roar Bakken Stovner: Oslo Metropolitan University

No w7e8q, OSF Preprints from Center for Open Science

Abstract: This paper considers the rationality of conclusions drawn from empirical social-science. Drawing on validity and institutional theories, our conceptual model views research methods as institutionalized approaches to supporting the (implicit) inferential argument that is used to validate conclusions. Breakdowns occur when researchers falsely believe that a method strongly supports the inferential argument, but where little support is provided. We identify two characteristics of methods that promote breakdowns and show that these characteristics explain breakdowns of two common methods, null hypothesis significance testing and cutoffs for fit indices. Last, we outline alternative methods that can support the same inferences but are less prone to breakdowns. Further, we discuss broadly how to reduce breakdowns in scientific practice.

Date: 2023-05-25
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://osf.io/download/646f474c9a89e200a71c43ad/

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:osf:osfxxx:w7e8q

DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/w7e8q

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in OSF Preprints from Center for Open Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by OSF ().