Closing the Visibility Gap: A Design Science Approach to Algorithmically Competitive Counter-Speech

Dionysios Andres
Additional contact information
Dionysios Andres: TruthShield

No 37bvc_v1, SocArXiv from Center for Open Science

Abstract: A recent integrative review identified the Visibility Gap as the structural discrepancy between the epistemic quality of counter-speech and its algorithmic competitiveness in platformised information environments. This article addresses the gap through design science research. Drawing on the Bystander Effect (Latané and Darley, 1970), social proof theory (Traberg, 2025), Population Intelligence (Tatham, 2015), the chronos/kairos distinction (Miller, 1994), the regulatory-theoretical diagnosis of the Public Discourse Paradox (Bassan, 2024, 2025), and cognitive warfare theory (Rushing et al., 2026), I derive five design principles for counterïspeech that combines verification capacity with algorithmic reach: platform-nativity, comïmunicative plurality, temporal competitiveness, epistemic integrity under optimisation, and transparent automation. I present an artifact instantiating these principles through a fourïlayer architecture integrating automated detection, persona-based intervention, embedded micro-inoculation, and adaptive evaluation. The artifact uses Thompson Sampling to opïtimise communicative delivery while structurally excluding factual content from the optiïmisation space. Evaluation through expert review and computational simulation supports the theoretical coherence of the design, provides preliminary evidence that the immutable constraint architecture resists reward poisoning under controlled conditions, and identifies persona authenticity and the tension between temporal competitiveness and human oversight as primary risks for field deployment. The central finding is that verification capacity and algorithmic reach, while analytically independent, are operationally coupled: achieving algoïrithmic competitiveness imposes constraints that interact with verification standards. The article contributes to scholarship on counter-speech, platform governance, and information disorder by demonstrating that the Visibility Gap is a design deficit rather than a knowledge deficit, and that principled design within a regulatory frame that legal-theoretical analysis has independently diagnosed can address it.

Date: 2026-05-08
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-inv
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://osf.io/download/69fb87abb6f8e890e98b909e/

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:osf:socarx:37bvc_v1

DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/37bvc_v1

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in SocArXiv from Center for Open Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by OSF ().