Global Crisis or Overblown Problem? Three Tools to Clarify Contentious Issues in Misinformation Research

Pietro Leonardo Nickl, Mubashir Sultan, Caedyn Stinson, Friederike Stock, Ralph Hertwig and Anastasia Kozyreva

No 4vhwq_v1, SocArXiv from Center for Open Science

Abstract: Alongside the rapid expansion of misinformation research, a line of academic arguments has emerged questioning its relevance and legitimacy. We dissect three key issues shaping the current debate: the prevalence of misinformation, its causal role, and the legitimacy of misinformation research. To bring more clarity to these contentious issues, we introduce three conceptual tools—the (Mis)information Funnel, the (Mis)information System, and the (Mis)information Lens, and use them to demonstrate how to move research on misinformation forward and systematically map future research directions. Our analysis shows that there are fewer genuine disagreements in this field than it seems at first glance, and that those that persist do not invalidate misinformation research. Different positions on each issue imply different directions, both for future misinformation research and policy making. Our analysis is, therefore, relevant not only for misinformation researchers, but also for practitioners and the general public.

Date: 2025-08-13
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://osf.io/download/689a49358a0201dd898934c4/

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:osf:socarx:4vhwq_v1

DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/4vhwq_v1

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in SocArXiv from Center for Open Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by OSF ().