Domestic and Family Violence Training Programs for Primary Healthcare Workforces: A Scoping Review

Bibek Chauhan, Shauna Fjaagesund, Amy Homes, Katrina Andrews, Gregory Nash, Chrystie Myketiak, Kylie Roberson, Sara Richards and Florin Oprescu

No 9c56s_v1, SocArXiv from Center for Open Science

Abstract: Purpose Domestic and family violence (DFV) is prevalent, and primary healthcare professionals may be well placed to identify and support victim-survivors; however, limited training and organizational support can constrain safe responses. This review mapped DFV training programs for primary healthcare workforces, including targeted groups, content, delivery, and evaluation. Methods A scoping review was conducted using the Joanna Briggs Institute framework and reported according to PRISMA-ScR. PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and PsycINFO were searched for peer-reviewed studies published from 2016 to 2026. Eligible studies evaluated the characteristics, implementation, or outcomes of DFV workforce training in primary healthcare. Of 1,262 records identified, 16 studies met the inclusion criteria. Results Training most often targeted general practitioners (n = 11) and nurses or midwives (n = 9); administrative staff (n = 4) and practice managers (n = 3) were less frequently included. Common content included DFV identification and inquiry, disclosure response, referral, risk assessment, and safety planning. Face-to-face workshops predominated, often supplemented by mentoring, case discussion, role-play, and implementation support. Evaluations mainly assessed short-term knowledge, confidence, and preparedness; sustained practice and organizational outcomes were assessed less often. Conclusions DFV training may improve primary healthcare professionals’ knowledge, confidence, and preparedness to support victim-survivors, but predominantly short-term and self-reported outcomes limit conclusions about sustained clinical change. Evidence gaps remain in organizational readiness, workforce agency, long-term implementation, and inclusion of non-clinical staff.

Date: 2026-10-12
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://osf.io/download/6ac9938c333d8cf33b4ef7fb/

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:osf:socarx:9c56s_v1

DOI: 10.31235/osf.io/9c56s_v1

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in SocArXiv from Center for Open Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by OSF ().