Transformations of Science and Technology since 1800. Conceptual framework, preliminary results, and a glossary from the DFG Research Training Group 2696

Thomas Heinze, Dania Achermann, Radin Dardashti, Ralf Krömer, Anna Leuschner, Thomas Morel, Anne Sophie Overkamp, Volker Remmert, Gregor Schiemann and Anna Sieben
Additional contact information
Thomas Heinze: University of Wuppertal

No 9sg34_v1, SocArXiv from Center for Open Science

Abstract: The DFG Research Training Group 2696 “Transformations of Science and Technology since 1800: Topics, Processes, Institutions” (RTG 2696) at the University of Wuppertal investigates how scientific knowledge and technological capabilities change over time without reducing modes of change to either path dependency or revolutions. Instead, it focuses on transformations as being multidimensional and often gradual-cumulative, while recognizing critical junctures. The program’s shared framework employs varieties of institutionalist approaches (such as Historical Institutionalism, Sociological Institu-tionalism) across three interacting dimensions: topics (theories, concepts, tacit knowledge), processes (experimental, communicative, application-oriented practices), and institutions (universities, laboratories, education systems, infrastructures). Substantively, the RTG addresses field formation and disciplinary change; shifts in epistemic practices; material and technical infrastructures; and narratives of the new and the old, using state-of-the-art methods grounded in history, sociology, and philosophy. These include comparative-historical case studies; qualitative and quantitative methods of empirical social research; conceptual analysis; as well as argumentative reconstruction. Interim results comprise completed dissertations on high-energy physics, medical skills labs, observational standards, and the classification of personality disorders, as well as ongoing projects on the development of academic disciplines (such as mathematics, psychology, economics, and biology), university funding and stratification, space tech-nology, technological persistence, and gendered historiography. Together, these studies aim to test and refine the RTG’s shared vocabulary, enabling synthesis and comparison in the study of transformations (glossary).

Date: 2026-03-24
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-his and nep-knm
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://osf.io/download/69c113fe54739ebf25228ebd/

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:osf:socarx:9sg34_v1

DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/9sg34_v1

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in SocArXiv from Center for Open Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by OSF ().