EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Retrofitting, densification and nature-based solutions in Paris and Orléans: Stakeholder scenario mapping (ReHousIn Deliverable 5.2, France)

Federica Rotondo, Sarah Bouchafa, Marco Cremaschi, Tommaso Prof Vitale and Antoine Guirronet
Additional contact information
Tommaso Prof Vitale: Sciences Po

No 9vba3_v1, SocArXiv from Center for Open Science

Abstract: This empirical report presents the results of three stakeholder scenario-mapping workshops held in June 2026 in Paris and Orléans as part of the Horizon Europe project ReHousIn (Deliverable 5.2). For the interpretive synthesis of the French case and its European comparison, see Cremaschi, Guironnet, Rotondo and Vitale (2026), doi:10.31235/osf.io/ynkcr_v1. The workshops brought together municipal and metropolitan administrations, public development agencies, social housing providers, private developers and housing support organisations to examine the distributive effects of three green housing interventions: housing retrofitting combined with nature-based solutions in Paris and in Orléans, and densification through land recycling in the Paris region. For each case, the report reconstructs the key impacts, the mechanisms that explain them and the variations across scenarios, then outlines pathways towards just futures, with their levers and trade-offs. Findings show that energy savings from retrofitting are modest and unevenly shared: social housing tenants benefit most, while low-income owner-occupiers in condominiums face upfront costs with payback periods of 20 to 30 years, longer than their expected tenure, which can push them to sell. Densification generates amenities but mainly raises property values, with gains captured by surrounding owners and displacement risks for private tenants. In Orléans, one-for-one demolition rules have led to de-densification. The report identifies policy levers (rent regulation, deferred-repayment advances for low-income owners, public land control, developer charters, regulatory stability) and two non-negotiable principles: no displacement of lower-income residents because of works, and no rise in housing costs without support for vulnerable households.

Date: 2026-09-29
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://osf.io/download/6adcee64b8c0f08a5f13fc7c/

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:osf:socarx:9vba3_v1

DOI: 10.31235/osf.io/9vba3_v1

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in SocArXiv from Center for Open Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by OSF ().

 
Page updated 2026-11-02
Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:9vba3_v1