Is carrying capacity useful for integrating humans into Earth system models? On the purpose, and the limits, of modelling

Tilman Hartley

No e86bm, SocArXiv from Center for Open Science

Abstract: There are calls to better incorporate humans into Earth system models. Some have attempted this using the concept of ‘carrying capacity’. But the concept of carrying capacity has been subject to forceful critique, as it vastly simplifies the many complex factors which affect human populations. This includes factors related to human behaviour, which is so unpredictable that it seems to resist formalisation altogether. Nevertheless, I suggest that the usefulness of a simplified concept like ‘carrying capacity’ depends on the purposes for which it is used. In toy models intended to elucidate a complex phenomenon, a simplified concept might indeed be useful. On the other hand, in forecast models intended for theory testing, a more complex concept may better approximate observed reality. I illustrate this point by looking at two recent toy models which use the concept of carrying capacity to elucidate idealised population dynamics, and at a series of forecast models which instead aim to estimate the population density of real groups in real conditions. In short, the usefulness of concepts depends on modelling choices, which in turn depend upon the purpose for which a given model has been constructed.

Date: 2024-12-17
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-evo and nep-hme
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://osf.io/download/675aed391a50d23d8d936dcb/

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:osf:socarx:e86bm

DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/e86bm

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in SocArXiv from Center for Open Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by OSF ().