Beyond Remediation: An Irreversibility Threshold for Preventive AI Governance

Sushil Duseja

No g3rnj_v1, SocArXiv from Center for Open Science

Abstract: Existing AI governance instruments provide essential foundations for oversight, with strong capabilities for harms that can be detected, bounded, attributed, and substantially remediated after the fact. This paper examines how that architecture can be further specified for three categories of AI-mediated outcome where restorability can fail under identifiable conditions: epistemic contagion through synthetic misinformation, reputational destruction via AI-generated defamation, and structural labor displacement driven by automation at scale. Through comparative regulatory analysis of four core Euro-Atlantic frameworks (the EU AI Act, the NIST AI RMF, the UK White Paper, and the OECD incident-reporting framework), with the G7 Hiroshima Code used as an interoperability reference, the paper identifies an opportunity for additional operational specification: an explicit threshold for the point at which remediation should be complemented by additional ex ante safeguards. It proposes the Systemic Irreversibility Baseline as that complementary layer. The Baseline routes responses along distinct tracks: standard remediation for restorable product-side harms, strict liability for localized irreversible product-side harms, precautionary technical architecture for systemically irreversible productside harms, and macroeconomic transition policy for intended-utility displacement. Four design mandates operationalize the precautionary track: traceable human oversight, auditable uncertainty thresholds for bounded decision tasks, epistemic user-interface friction, and contentprovenance infrastructure. Throughout, "effectively irreversible harm" denotes harm for which restoration to functional equivalence is not feasible within governance-relevant time horizons. The contribution is a governance design framework grounded in existing empirical literatures and comparative legal analysis, intended to complement current regulatory systems rather than replace them.

Date: 2026-03-25
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-inv and nep-reg
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://osf.io/download/69c38718638e26def654cae7/

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:osf:socarx:g3rnj_v1

DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/g3rnj_v1

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in SocArXiv from Center for Open Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by OSF ().