Boundary Changes and Competitive Seat Exclusion in Singapore’s 2025 Redistricting: An Ensemble-Based Test

David Goh
Additional contact information
David Goh: University of Toronto

No p7q2m_v1, SocArXiv from Center for Open Science

Abstract: We test whether Singapore's 2025 electoral redistricting produced a statistically anomalous allocation of competitively contested territory. Using a hypergeometric permutation test, we examine the 114 subzones that changed constituency between the 2020 and 2025 general elections. Among the 52 subzones originating from competitive 2020 constituencies (PAP vote share < 55%), zero ended up in competitive 2025 constituencies—against an expected value of 3.2 under random redistribution (Fisher’s exact p = 0.012). The anomaly follows a specific pattern: the new competitive seat (Jalan Kayu SMC) was seeded from stronghold populations, while dissolved competitive constituencies were absorbed into safe districts. A complementary MCMC ensemble analysis using GerryChain finds that while Singapore’s boundaries are extreme outliers in geometric compactness, this is consistent with administrative logic rather than partisan gerrymandering. We conclude that while the GRC block-vote remains the primary seat-to-vote bonus mechanism, redistricting serves as a secondary mechanism for managing competitive communities.

Date: 2026-04-22
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-pol
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://osf.io/download/69e6d48089d4244530923962/

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:osf:socarx:p7q2m_v1

DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/p7q2m_v1

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in SocArXiv from Center for Open Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by OSF ().