The effects of International Monetary Fund programs: a systematic review with narrative synthesis on poverty, inequality, and social indicators

Ricardo Alonzo Fernandez Salguero

No pbdn8_v1, SocArXiv from Center for Open Science

Abstract: Background: The debate over the impact of the International Monetary Fund's (IMF) structural adjustment programs on borrowing countries has been a central topic in political economy for decades. The empirical evidence is profoundly heterogeneous and often contradictory. Objective: This systematic review with narrative synthesis synthesizes and critically analyzes the literature to assess the effects of such programs on key indicators like poverty, income inequality, social spending (health and education), health outcomes (mortality, infectious diseases), the labor market, and informality. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in five academic databases and grey literature, following PRISMA guidelines. A total of 53 studies and empirical contributions that met predefined selection criteria were included. The risk of bias for each study was assessed, paying special attention to the control of endogeneity and selection bias. Due to the methodological heterogeneity of the studies, the results were synthesized narratively. Results: A minority of studies, often employing methodologies with a higher risk of bias such as Propensity Score Matching (PSM), find no significant negative effects. In contrast, a robust body of research, using quasi-experimental designs with a low risk of bias like Instrumental Variables (IV), documents an increase in inequality, a deterioration of health outcomes (especially in tuberculosis and child mortality), and a rise in the informal economy as a consequence of IMF conditionalities. Conclusion: The differences in findings are largely attributed to the diversity of methodologies and the rigor with which they address causal inference. Higher-quality evidence suggests that IMF programs, particularly those with austerity conditionalities and structural reforms, impose significant social costs. These impacts call for a redesign of conditionality that prioritizes social protection to meet the Sustainable Development Goals.

Date: 2025-11-08
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://osf.io/download/690e5c081c90be89ce3ee1fd/

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:osf:socarx:pbdn8_v1

DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/pbdn8_v1

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in SocArXiv from Center for Open Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by OSF ().