Beyond Rhetoric: Stakeholder Discourse and Urban Flooding in Accra, Ghana, 2015–2025

Yvonne Appiah Dadson and Nana barima Amankwah

No rqdz3_v1, SocArXiv from Center for Open Science

Abstract: On June 3, 2015, Ghana experienced a catastrophic twin disaster when torrential rains exceeding 150 millimeters caused severe flooding across Accra, followed by an explosion at a GOIL (Ghana Oil Company) petrol station that claimed between 150 and 250 lives. This study offers a narrative and discourse synthesis of academic literature, government and institutional statements, and news media coverage that spans 2015–2025, and examines how stakeholders framed disaster causation, attributed responsibility, and constructed narratives about urban vulnerability. Recurring patterns across these sources include persistent infrastructure inadequacy, conflicting attributions of blame between government and academic accounts, chronic emergency response capacity constraints, stigmatizing framing of informal settlements, limited emphasis on climate change relative to governance failures, and a widening gap between stated policy commitments and implementation outcomes. Academic discourse evolved toward structural analysis that situates vulnerability within the dynamics of informal urban development, while government discourse remained focused on behavioral factors. May 2025 flooding killed four people, one in Abokobi and three in Adenta, and displaced over 3,000 people almost exactly ten years after 2015. This pattern indicates that stated policy commitments did not translate into improved outcomes. The National Disaster Management Organisation (NADMO) publicly acknowledged inadequate relief resources, a statement in apparent tension with a decade of capacity-building rhetoric. Survey research finds that 52 % of households attribute flooding to weak enforcement of land use regulations, with no statistical correlation to rainfall intensity, while a separate citizen-science study found that 59 % of flooded zones in Accra are deprived communities where formal risk models often underestimate vulnerability. Evidence on community response indicates residents are neither passive victims nor simply unprepared, but active agents adapting with constrained resources and often more accurate local knowledge than formal risk models capture. Implementation gaps appear to reflect weak accountability mechanisms, limited institutional capacity, political incentive structures that favor short-term projects, and insufficient civil society monitoring. Emerging partnerships, including I-DIEM, which emphasizes equity-centered approaches, and FAO, which promotes community-based response, represent potential transformation directions, though their effectiveness depends on sustained commitment and genuine institutional change. Keywords: disaster management, discourse analysis, urban flooding, Ghana, emergency response, urban vulnerability, institutional accountability

Date: 2026-07-04
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://osf.io/download/6a47d5485d1882e0a6daa308/

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:osf:socarx:rqdz3_v1

DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/rqdz3_v1

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in SocArXiv from Center for Open Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by OSF ().