Introduction to Inframarginalism

Ramsi Woodcock

No xghn8, SocArXiv from Center for Open Science

Abstract: Progressives who respond to conservative law and economic arguments by rejecting neoclassical economic theory are making a mistake because neoclassical economics is the only ideology that honors the modern view—associated with the Death of God narrative in Western culture—that there are no longer universal standards of value. To make a case for redistribution of wealth that appeals to the modern view regarding value—one that progressives themselves hold—progressives must engage with economics. Fortunately, the concept of the gains from trade in neoclassical economics (also known as “surplus” or “economic rent”) allows progressives to make a strong case for redistribution of wealth because the gains from trade do not need to be appropriated by any particular market participant in order for efficiency to prevail in markets. This approach is called “inframarginalism” to contrast it with the conservative view that the valuations of the marginal buyer and seller pin down price in competitive markets and therefore leave progressives no room for redistribution.

Date: 2024-08-09
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-reg
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://osf.io/download/66b51d08a06de5aa4993363d/

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:osf:socarx:xghn8

DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/xghn8

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in SocArXiv from Center for Open Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by OSF ().