Designing Fiscal Recognition: Protected Student Inclusion Account Models for Compulsory Public Education

Kyle Hyatt

No ybptc_v1, SocArXiv from Center for Open Science

Abstract: Abstract Paper 1 supplied a descriptive measurement framework for compulsory student time, and Paper 2 supplied a proposed institutional account of the recognition boundary. This article does not recalculate, revise, or crosswalk either contribution. It addresses a bounded policy-design question: how a legislature might later specify a student-beneficial restricted public-account architecture without premising the proposal on compensable student labor, wage entitlement, damages, restitution, or a claim that education lacks value. A Protected Student Inclusion Account (PSIA) is the article’s proposed candidate restricted public-account architecture for later jurisdiction-specific consideration. The article compares candidate mechanisms as design objects with unresolved legal, benefits, custody, access, fiscal, and administrative dependencies. Transition capacity is treated only as an authorial normative design objective and a possible pilot evaluation domain. The illustrative deposit arithmetic reports nominal student deposits under disclosed inputs; it is not a fiscal note or a statement about legal authority, fiscal conditions, administrative performance, or outcomes.

Date: 2026-07-04
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://osf.io/download/6a47f558b7fe0ff5d844f851/

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:osf:socarx:ybptc_v1

DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/ybptc_v1

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in SocArXiv from Center for Open Science
Bibliographic data for series maintained by OSF ().