On Corporate Cartels as Common Pool Resources*
W Benedikt Schmal
Journal of Competition Law and Economics, 2025, vol. 21, issue 4, 647-665
Abstract:
Governing the complex institution of a corporate cartel is inherently challenging: colluding firms must jointly manage prices and quantities, avoid detection by authorities, and ensure internal discipline against cheating—all without access to legal enforcement. This paper proposes a novel interpretation of cartel excess profits as a common pool resource (CPR), contrasting with the dominant prisoner’s dilemma framework. Following a three-step approach, the paper first establishes how cartel profits meet the criteria of a CPR. Based on that definition, it applies Elinor Ostrom’s Institutional Analysis and Development framework to analyze the internal governance of cartels. Third, it derives policy recommendations that equip competition authorities with new tools to detect and understand collusion. By reframing cartels as self-governed CPR systems, the paper offers fresh insights at the intersection of managerial governance, antitrust law, and industrial organization. This opens new avenues for both theoretical and applied research.
JEL-codes: A14 D02 D23 K42 L40 O17 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/joclec/nhaf017 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:jcomle:v:21:y:2025:i:4:p:647-665.
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Competition Law and Economics is currently edited by Nicholas Economides, Amelia Fletcher, Michal Gal, Damien Geradin, Ioannis Lianos and Tommaso Valletti
More articles in Journal of Competition Law and Economics from Oxford University Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().