Removing, duplicating, rearranging matter from/of the prior art? Some remarks on recent ‘Lego’ design case law

Henning Hartwig

Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice, 2025, vol. 20, issue 12, 765-774

Abstract: Prior art is paramount for assessing the validity of a design right. Under a correct reading of EU design law, the mere removal of features from the prior art cannot form the basis of a finding of validity, especially the presence of individual character. The same is true where features are simply duplicated or rearranged.Unfortunately, recent case law revolving around EU designs registered on behalf of Lego A/S provides mixed guidance on these issues.

Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jiplp/jpaf064 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:jiplap:v:20:y:2025:i:12:p:765-774.

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice is currently edited by Eleonora Rosati, Stefano Barazza and Marius Schneider

More articles in Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice from Oxford University Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().