EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

QE: a successful start may be running into diminishing returns

Charles A. E. Goodhart and Jonathan P. Ashworth

Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 2012, vol. 28, issue 4, 640-670

Abstract: Existing studies may have underestimated the impact of QE1 on UK GDP because they did not take full account of the beneficial effect on credit risk spreads and on the exchange rate. However, all such effects were also influenced by the roughly simultaneous introduction of similar easing in the USA, which complicates the analysis. Another area where QE has been positive is in reducing public-sector borrowing costs. Where QE1 (and subsequent rounds) have disappointed is in their inability to stimulate a recovery in credit and monetary growth, amid an increased desire among banks to hold far more of their reserves at the central bank. Moreover, there is growing evidence of significant diminishing returns in QE2 as gilt rates have already fallen to historically low levels and the risk is that, if policy-makers fail to resuscitate the bank lending channel, further rounds of QE could potentially have negative returns Copyright 2012, Oxford University Press.

Date: 2012
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (49)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/oxrep/grs034 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:oxford:v:28:y:2012:i:4:p:640-670

Access Statistics for this article

Oxford Review of Economic Policy is currently edited by Christopher Adam

More articles in Oxford Review of Economic Policy from Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:oup:oxford:v:28:y:2012:i:4:p:640-670