Measuring the Cyclicality of Real Wages: How Important is Composition Bias?

Gary Solon, Robert Barsky and Jonathan Parker

The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1994, vol. 109, issue 1, 1-25

Abstract: In the period since the 1960s, as in other periods, aggregate time series on real wages have displayed only modest cyclicality. Macroeconomists therefore have described weak cyclicality of real wages as a salient feature of the business cycle. Contrary to this conventional wisdom, our analysis of longitudinal microdata indicates that real wages have been substantially procyclical since the 1960s. We show that the true procyclicality of real wages is obscured in aggregate time series because of a composition bias: the aggregate statistics are constructed in a way that gives more weight to low-skill workers during expansions than during recessions.

Date: 1994
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (571)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.2307/2118426 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: Measuring the Cyclicality of Real Wages: How Important is Composition Bias (1992)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:qjecon:v:109:y:1994:i:1:p:1-25.

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals

Access Statistics for this article

The Quarterly Journal of Economics is currently edited by Robert J. Barro, Lawrence F. Katz, Nathan Nunn, Andrei Shleifer and Stefanie Stantcheva

More articles in The Quarterly Journal of Economics from President and Fellows of Harvard College
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().