The Paradox of Liquidity

Stewart C. Myers and Raghuram Rajan

The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1998, vol. 113, issue 3, 733-771

Abstract: The more liquid a firm's assets, the greater their value in a short-notice liquidation. It is generally thought that a firm should find it easier to raise external finance against more liquid assets. This paper focuses on the dark side of liquidity: greater asset liquidity reduces the firm's ability to commit to a specific course of action. As a result, greater asset liquidity can, in some circumstances, reduce the firm's capacity to raise external finance. Firms with "excessively" liquid assets are in the best position to finance illiquid projects. This leads us to a theory of financial intermediation and disintermediation based on the liquidity of assets.

Date: 1998
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (405)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1162/003355398555739 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: The Paradox of Liquidity (1995)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:qjecon:v:113:y:1998:i:3:p:733-771.

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals

Access Statistics for this article

The Quarterly Journal of Economics is currently edited by Robert J. Barro, Lawrence F. Katz, Nathan Nunn, Andrei Shleifer and Stefanie Stantcheva

More articles in The Quarterly Journal of Economics from President and Fellows of Harvard College
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().