Why Do New Technologies Complement Skills? Directed Technical Change and Wage Inequality
Daron Acemoglu
The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1998, vol. 113, issue 4, 1055-1089
Abstract:
A high proportion of skilled workers in the labor force implies a large market size for skill-complementary technologies, and encourages faster upgrading of the productivity of skilled workers. As a result, an increase in the supply of skills reduces the skill premium in the short run, but then it induces skill-biased technical change and increases the skill premium, possibly even above its initial value. This theory suggests that the rapid increase in the proportion of college graduates in the United States labor force in the 1970s may have been a causal factor in both the decline in the college premium during the 1970s and the large increase in inequality during the 1980s.
Date: 1998
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1326)
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1162/003355398555838 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
Working Paper: Why Do New Technologies Complement Skills? Directed Technical Change and Wage Inequality (1997) 
Working Paper: Why Do New Technologies Complement Skills? Directed Technical Change and Wage Inequality (1997)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:qjecon:v:113:y:1998:i:4:p:1055-1089.
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://academic.oup.com/journals
Access Statistics for this article
The Quarterly Journal of Economics is currently edited by Robert J. Barro, Lawrence F. Katz, Nathan Nunn, Andrei Shleifer and Stefanie Stantcheva
More articles in The Quarterly Journal of Economics from President and Fellows of Harvard College
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().