Do Proxies for Informed Trading Measure Informed Trading? Evidence from Illegal Insider Trades
Kenneth Ahern
The Review of Asset Pricing Studies, vol. 10, issue 3, 397-440
Abstract:
This paper exploits hand-collected data on illegal insider trades to provide new evidence on the ability of a host of standard measures of illiquidity to detect informed trading. Controlling for unobserved cross-sectional and time-series variation, sampling bias, and strategic timing of insider trades, I find that when information is short-lived, only absolute order imbalance and effective spread are statistically and economically robust predictors of illegal insider trading. However, when information is long-lasting, insiders strategically time their trades to avoid illiquidity, and none of the standard measures considered are reliable predictors, including bid-ask spreads, order imbalance, Kyle’s λ, and Amihud illiquidity. (JEL D53D82G12G14K42)Received: March 14, 2019; Editorial decision: February 18, 2020 by Editor Thierry Foucault. Authors have furnished an Internet Appendix, which is available on the Oxford University Press Web site next to the link to the final published paper online.
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/rapstu/raaa004 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
Working Paper: Do Proxies for Informed Trading Measure Informed Trading? Evidence from Illegal Insider Trades (2018) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:rasset:v:10:y::i:3:p:397-440.
Access Statistics for this article
The Review of Asset Pricing Studies is currently edited by Zhiguo He
More articles in The Review of Asset Pricing Studies from Society for Financial Studies
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().