Reply to the letter on Ancaiani et al. ‘Evaluating Scientific research in Italy: The 2004–10 research evaluation exercise’

Sergio Benedetto, Tindaro Cicero, Marco Malgarini () and Carmen Nappi

Research Evaluation, 2017, vol. 26, issue 4, 358-360

Abstract: Baccini and De Nicolao (2017) provide some criticism on the results showed in Ancaiani et al (2015) concerning the Italian Evaluation exercise (VQR in the Italian acronym). In this reply we provide ample evidence that the issues raised do not weaken the main results previously presented in any substantial way.

Keywords: research assessment; peer review; bibliometrics; Italy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/reseval/rvx017 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:rseval:v:26:y:2017:i:4:p:358-360.

Access Statistics for this article

Research Evaluation is currently edited by Julia Melkers, Emanuela Reale and Thed van Leeuwen

More articles in Research Evaluation from Oxford University Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().