Missed marks: understanding the disconnect of research methodology courses in combating predatory publishing

Vairavan Muthukumar and Rajadurai Vijay Solomon

Research Evaluation, 2026, vol. 35

Abstract: Predatory publishing remains a significant challenge in developing countries, including India, despite numerous awareness programs and initiatives aimed at sensitizing faculty to scientific writing, research methodology, and publishing ethics. Although research methodology courses are formally included in academic curricula, the “pay-and-publish” culture persists. To investigate this contradiction, we analyzed the research methodology syllabi of 106 NIRF 2021-ranked colleges using stratified random sampling. Our analysis focused on key publication ethics topics, such as predatory journals, plagiarism, and peer review. The findings indicate a strong emphasis on conducting research but a lack of adequate guidance on publishing in reputable journals. We recommend extending PhD-level coursework on research and publication ethics to postgraduate students and providing comprehensive training for faculty to address predatory practices and educate researchers on avoiding such journals. This knowledge is essential for safeguarding academic integrity and improving publication standards.

Keywords: publication ethics; predatory journals; cloned or hijacked journals; research methodology syllabus; PhD course work (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2026
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/reseval/rvag006 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:rseval:v:35:y:2026:i::p:rvag006.

Access Statistics for this article

Research Evaluation is currently edited by Julia Melkers, Emanuela Reale and Thed van Leeuwen

More articles in Research Evaluation from Oxford University Press
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Oxford University Press ().