Ecological Effects of Basic Income

Michael W. Howard (), Jorge Pinto and Ulrich Schachtschneider
Additional contact information
Michael W. Howard: University of Maine
Jorge Pinto: University of Minho
Ulrich Schachtschneider: Freiburg Institute for Basic Income Studies

Chapter Chapter 8 in The Palgrave International Handbook of Basic Income, 2023, pp 151-174 from Palgrave Macmillan

Abstract: Abstract Howard, Pinto and Schachtschneider consider ecological arguments for a Basic Income. Environmental limits mean that economic growth might no longer be possible, and some argue that a Basic Income could afford economic security without continued economic growth. A Basic Income could facilitate work sharing, less energy-intensive work, reduced demand for wasteful positional goods, and experiments in living in the autonomous sector. Green growth strategies, including a carbon fee and dividend, are compared with degrowth strategies that call for an absolute decrease in consumption while including a Basic Income to avoid adverse impact on workers and the poor. The resulting redistribution, however, could increase carbon emissions. This means that Basic Income might require complementary policies, such as work time reduction, in order to reach ecological goals.

Date: 2023
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:etbchp:978-3-031-41001-7_8

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.palgrave.com/9783031410017

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-41001-7_8

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Exploring the Basic Income Guarantee from Palgrave Macmillan
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().