The Probationary Period as a Screening Device: The Monopolistic Insurer

Jaap Spreeuw

The Geneva Risk and Insurance Review, 2005, vol. 30, issue 1, 5-14

Abstract: Stiglitz [1977], considering asymmetry of information in a monopolistic insurance market and the monetary deductible as a screening device, shows that an equilibrium is always of a separating type. High risks buy complete insurance whilst low risks buy partial insurance. In this paper, we show that a pooling equilibrium may exist if a probationary period, rather than the partial coverage in monetary terms, is used as a screening device. The Geneva Risk and Insurance Review (2005) 30, 5–14. doi:10.1007/s10836-005-1104-5

Date: 2005
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.palgrave-journals.com/grir/journal/v30/n1/pdf/grir2005171a.pdf Link to full text PDF (application/pdf)
http://www.palgrave-journals.com/grir/journal/v30/n1/full/grir2005171a.html Link to full text HTML (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Journal Article: The Probationary Period as a Screening Device: The Monopolistic Insurer (2005)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:genrir:v:30:y:2005:i:1:p:5-14

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/journal/10713

Access Statistics for this article

The Geneva Risk and Insurance Review is currently edited by Michael Hoy and Nicolas Treich

More articles in The Geneva Risk and Insurance Review from Palgrave Macmillan, International Association for the Study of Insurance Economics (The Geneva Association) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().