Tax Compliance and Rank Dependent Expected Utility

Jean-Louis Arcand and Grégoire Rota Graziosi

The Geneva Risk and Insurance Review, 2005, vol. 30, issue 1, 57-69

Abstract: Formulating the classic Allingham and Sandmo [1972] tax compliance problem under Rank Dependent Expected Utility (RDEU) provides a simple explanation for the “excess” level of full compliance observed in empirical studies, which standard Expected Utility (EU) theory is unable to explain. RDEU provides a compelling answer to this puzzle, without the need for the moral sentiments or stigma arguments that have recently been advanced in the literature. Formally, we show that the threshold audit probability or penalty rate at which full compliance becomes optimal for the decisionmaker are significantly lower under RDEU axiomatics than in the EU case, and that the optimal level of underreporting is lower under RDEU. Numerical simulations using various parameterizations of the probability weighting function illustrate the large quantitative differences between the two models, while a simulation of underreporting rates in the US over the past 50 years shows how RDEU can go some way towards explaining the tax-compliance puzzle. The Geneva Risk and Insurance Review (2005) 30, 57–69. doi:10.1007/s10836-005-1108-1

Date: 2005
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (7)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.palgrave-journals.com/grir/journal/v30/n1/pdf/grir2005175a.pdf Link to full text PDF (application/pdf)
http://www.palgrave-journals.com/grir/journal/v30/n1/full/grir2005175a.html Link to full text HTML (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Journal Article: Tax Compliance and Rank Dependent Expected Utility (2005)
Working Paper: Tax Compliance and Rank-Dependent Expected Utility (2004)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:genrir:v:30:y:2005:i:1:p:57-69

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/journal/10713

Access Statistics for this article

The Geneva Risk and Insurance Review is currently edited by Michael Hoy and Nicolas Treich

More articles in The Geneva Risk and Insurance Review from Palgrave Macmillan, International Association for the Study of Insurance Economics (The Geneva Association) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().