A Comparative Study of International Insurance Markets&ast

Wei Zheng, Yongdong Liu and Yiting Deng
Additional contact information
Wei Zheng: [1] aDepartment of Risk Management and Insurance, School of Economics, Peking University, Beijing, China. [2] bChina Centre for Insurance and Social Security Research (CCISSR), Peking University, Beijing 100871, China.
Yongdong Liu: Centre for Chinese Agricultural Policy, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China.
Yiting Deng: China Centre for Economic Research (CCER), Peking University, Beijing 100871, China.

The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, 2009, vol. 34, issue 1, 85-99

Abstract: By proposing the Benchmark Ratio of Insurance Penetration (BRIP) as a new paradigm for international insurance comparison, this paper makes a new assessment and comparison of insurance growth levels of certain countries as well as certain economic groups, and further discusses the policy implications. The main conclusions of this paper are as follows. First, it is necessary to have a new recognition of the international insurance growth pattern: the relative level of insurance growth in developed markets has declined as compared with that indicated by traditional indicators, and the relative level of insurance growth in developing markets has increased. The relative growth level of the insurance industry in developed markets is still higher than that in developing markets, but the insurance industry in emerging markets and Brazil, Russia, India and China (BRIC) is undergoing rapid development and has achieved a relatively high level. Second, when considering global expansion strategy, insurance companies should not only continue to consolidate market share in developed markets but also actively explore developing markets. In the meantime, insurance companies need to pay special attention to the fact that the relative insurance growth of emerging markets and BRIC has already reached a relatively high level. Although there is still significant potential for growth, the growth will mainly be driven by the ordinary economic factors, and the pattern of insurance growth would be expected to experience great changes. Third, the insurance industry policy for developing countries should focus on the adjustment and improvement of the pattern of growth instead of the quantitative increase in growth, so as to build a solid foundation for sustainable insurance growth in the long-term future. Fourth, the traditional paradigms are confined by certain limitations, so that we have to establish a more solid paradigm for international insurance comparison. By doing so, we can build a more reasonable foundation for international cooperation in insurance regulation and for relevant negotiation of international trade. The Geneva Papers (2009) 34, 85–99. doi:10.1057/gpp.2008.37

Date: 2009
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.palgrave-journals.com/gpp/journal/v34/n1/pdf/gpp200837a.pdf Link to full text PDF (application/pdf)
http://www.palgrave-journals.com/gpp/journal/v34/n1/full/gpp200837a.html Link to full text HTML (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:gpprii:v:34:y:2009:i:1:p:85-99

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/finance/journal/41288/PS2

Access Statistics for this article

The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice is currently edited by Christophe Courbage

More articles in The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice from Palgrave Macmillan, The Geneva Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().