Long-Term Constraints on India’s Industrial Growth, 1951–1968 1

Amiya K. Bagchi
Additional contact information
Amiya K. Bagchi: Presidency College

Chapter 10 in Economic Development in South Asia, 1970, pp 170-198 from Palgrave Macmillan

Abstract: Abstract The First Five-Year Plan of India, everyone agrees, was more a collection of projects than a well-formulated programme of action spanning a reasonably long time-horizon. By contrast, an explicit long-term model was provided for the Second Five-Year Plan (1956–61) of India. This model, which had a striking similarity to the model which had been formulated in 1928 by the Soviet economist G. A. Feldman, laid primary emphasis on the accelerated development of capital-goods industries as a means of raising the marginal rate of saving of the economy and of accelerating the rate of growth of national income.2 According to Professor P. C. Mahalanobis, the chief architect of this model, the aims were to ‘lay sound foundations’ for a continuing increase in the level of national income and the level of living to get rid of the fear of unemployment (if possible, in ten years), and to bring about increasing opportunities and the lessening of great disparities of income and wealth.3 While self-reliance was to be promoted by the development of capital-goods industries, the objective of redistribution of economic power towards the poorer income groups was to be pursued, inter alia, by the state assuming the major share of responsibility for investment in the capital-goods industries. Small-scale and cottage industries were to be developed with the twin objectives of providing more consumer goods and more employment. It was widely believed that the control of the new investment in capital-goods industries combined with the apparatus of direct and indirect controls (pricing, fiscal and monetary policies) would provide the state with enough leverage to determine the allocation of national income between consumption and saving and of total investment between ‘essential’ and ‘non-essential’ industries, the criterion of essentiality being a positive contribution towards ensuring self-reliant growth in the not-too-distant future.

Keywords: Foreign Exchange; National Income; Excess Capacity; Domestic Saving; Mixed Economy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1970
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:intecp:978-1-349-00964-0_10

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.palgrave.com/9781349009640

DOI: 10.1007/978-1-349-00964-0_10

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in International Economic Association Series from Palgrave Macmillan
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().