Constitutional Engineering
Giovanni Sartori
Additional contact information
Giovanni Sartori: Columbia University
Chapter 13 in Comparative Constitutional Engineering, 1994, pp 197-204 from Palgrave Macmillan
Abstract:
Abstract It serves no useful purpose, in my opinion, to refer ‘constitutionalism’ all the way back to the Greeks and the Romans. The Greek term for what we call constitution was politeía (which is also translated ‘republic’), and the Latin constitutio had nothing to do with what we call constitution (Sartori, 1962). As we reach the middle of the seventeenth century, during Cromwell’s protectorate the notion of constitution had yet to appear. The time of Cromwell was the time in which the English especially engaged in what we conceive as constitution-drafting. Yet, the documents of the time were called covenants, instruments, agreements, and fundamental law — never ‘constitution’. The term constitution and with it the notion of ‘constitutionalism’ is, then, an eighteenth century coinage, and gained general acceptance in our meaning of the concept in the wake of the American constitution-making experience.
Keywords: Constitutional Change; Policy Content; Greek Term; Major Institutional Change; Transitional Item (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1994
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pal:intecp:978-1-349-22861-4_13
Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.palgrave.com/9781349228614
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-349-22861-4_13
Access Statistics for this chapter
More chapters in International Economic Association Series from Palgrave Macmillan
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().